Review on Dishonored (HUMOR, OBJECTIVITY, NOT LET'S PLAY)

Since this is my first time here, I want to bring you up to date. My reviews are an objective narrative about the game. Why objective? Well, because I'm just telling the facts. No what is good and what is bad.
But I understand perfectly well that no one is interested in watching or listening to some dude mumble. That's why I spice up my videos with skits and jokes.
Try it and see, I'm sure you'll like it.

Best comments

Delightful inconsistency.
If you are all so super-objective, then you should know that you cannot “relate” to a review: review and review are established genres that were formed before you and will outlive you. And if you are “one of these” nihilistic futurists, then read the relevant books in order to realize that you are wrong.
With permission, I am no longer participating in the discussion: they are not trying to humiliate you, but to help improve the quality of content. You - with thorns and yelling “I have the right! my video! I do what I want! I'm right!». Yes, do what you want, I'm neither cold nor hot.
But the viewer is always right, and of the three who spoke, everyone agreed.

magic plays a major role. So, wrestling also plays a major role. Wow. Well, stealth also plays a major role, but it doesn’t have to if you don’t want to. Wow, well, your actions also play a big role.

Magic, combat and stealth play together in a wonderful ensemble of replay value, which is crazy in this game. The player is free to choose which path to follow, there is an open, living world in front of him, where he is in charge, where every action affects what is happening, where the choice is only his.
This is to reveal the thought. It may be written crap, but it's quick.In view of the fact that you wrote everything in the first comment in the second comment, I see no point in continuing the argument further.

You won't believe https://betokaycasino.co.uk/login/ what I'm going to tell you, it may sound strange and shocking, but yes, it's unreasonable. After all, FUCK. The fact is that magic plays a major role, and the types of magic are information related to either the walkthrough or the guide, and not to the REVIEW ITSELF. your mother. It turns out that you have too much unnecessary information, you don’t know how to filter it. But why should I fish out the information I need from your stream of trash, and collect from it in my head an image of a review and opinion about the game, when I can read/watch 10 other reviews of the same game?

I played it for five minutes and deleted it.So it didn't pass. Religion does not allow you to open your mind? You don't have text, you have video, you can show.

? Wouldn't you be interested in a demonstration of these abilities, how they work and how you would like to use them??

You know how I want to use them? The telepath squad has finally returned from vacation? And why do I need a demonstration of abilities?? Don't think your viewers are idiots. And in general, maybe I want to copulate with a wall, because I’m a moron schoolboy with spermatotoxicosis, while laughing and shooting at the wall and teleporting into it.

INCREDIBLE detail. When a detailed retelling of all the skills at all levels began, I scratched my turnip in surprise - okay, I think. But when the author began to list the types of darts, he almost turned it off, though. And when it came to describing how to choose a weapon, it began to look more and more like a farce.
The whole text is trashed, in short. A bunch of completely unnecessary descriptions and listings that turn the video into a guide.
Yes, the microphone is decent. The voice is not annoying.
Humor - I don't know, it's probably funny, I'm not good at it.
Oh, and I was also pleased: “I only speak facts, I’m so objective” and, even before the start of the actual gameplay video: “Well, to me game reminded deus ex. “- no, I’m not blaming that, it was just funny.

Love the full detail. What I say at the very beginning of the video and at the end does not apply to the review, this is a prelude and epilogue.
I said how to choose weapons to logically move on to the problem with choosing weapons.
I read your opinion, I understood your indignation. Most often people who are accustomed to “classic” reviews write this way. I treat the review as a complete impartial description of the game and ALL of its features. You may think that some things could have been missed, but I believe that it is better to say more than less.

Why then talk about the game at all, when you can watch the first gameplay trailer about the game and already get all the information you need??
If I were to say “magic plays a major role. So, wrestling also plays a major role. Wow. Well, stealth also plays a major role, but it doesn’t have to if you don’t want to. Wow, well, your actions also play a big role.» What is this role?? Are you willing to believe someone who says so simply because they say so?? Wouldn't you be interested in a demonstration of these abilities, how they work and how you would like to use them?? I understand that you most likely have already completed this game and therefore these things seem unnecessary to you. Another thing, what did you expect to hear here new about the game that you have already completed??
And about fishing - I have all the information presented in the video, some things will seem uninteresting to you, and vice versa to others. I can't please absolutely everyone. But my video has ALL the information. That is, you can look at at least 100 fucking reviews, but I managed to fit all the information regarding this project (yes, this is my shortest review) into 15 minutes. And unlike other “reviews” I do not potentially replace YOUR opinion. Again, look on my channel for a review of a game that you haven’t completed, I think you won’t have any concerns about meticulousness.

Wouldn't you be interested in a demonstration of these abilities, how they work and how you would like to use them??

You are using my own quote against me without understanding the meaning of what was said. If I had said that magic plays a big role, I would not have given you any food for thought. And so, on the contrary, I give it to you, I give you information, ON THE BASIS OF which YOU can decide how YOU would act in this situation. You read it wrong.

Can you explain about the idea?? What is this thought that supposedly religion does not allow me to reveal??